First, I note that I don't like hanging around foul-mouths. They're often annoying, and, simply put, don't know the trade But right now I will delve into the morality of it.
Here it goes.
There is no specific verse in the Bible that forbids
swearing, only warnings against speaking “dirty and unwholesome” words. The
question then, is whether a cuss word need be a dirty word. Obviously, there is a substantial amount of
material evidence that many acts of cursing are immoral by the Biblical metric,
evidence that is so abundant it would pointless to cite. But if most are wrong, are all? Consider this verse from Ephesians:
4:29 Let no
unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of the moment, so that it will give
grace to those who hear.
There you have it.
The standard by which you judge the morality of your words – any words – is whether it edifies.
Now here’s the question. Have you ever been edified – encouraged, inspired, built-up – when you have heard a curse word used in one fashion or another? I sure know I have. Sometimes *crap* and *heck* just don’t cut it. Moreover, it’s amusing to see many anti-cussing Christians liberally use euphemisms in place of cussing (darn, crap, etc.) as if it was any better. Well guess what, it’s the same thing. The thought is there, the mental attitude is there, and people know exactly what you’re saying. Putting a * instead of the appropriate letter (spelling the s-word like sh*t) doesn’t elevate you on some moral high ground. It may be more socially acceptable, but, and it pains me to have to point this out, acceptability is not morality. (That doesn’t mean there’s never a place for the * or -. I still use them, because manners and good-faith still matter).
Now here’s the question. Have you ever been edified – encouraged, inspired, built-up – when you have heard a curse word used in one fashion or another? I sure know I have. Sometimes *crap* and *heck* just don’t cut it. Moreover, it’s amusing to see many anti-cussing Christians liberally use euphemisms in place of cussing (darn, crap, etc.) as if it was any better. Well guess what, it’s the same thing. The thought is there, the mental attitude is there, and people know exactly what you’re saying. Putting a * instead of the appropriate letter (spelling the s-word like sh*t) doesn’t elevate you on some moral high ground. It may be more socially acceptable, but, and it pains me to have to point this out, acceptability is not morality. (That doesn’t mean there’s never a place for the * or -. I still use them, because manners and good-faith still matter).
Actually, let me qualify that one. There are two elements to the edification
metric. When you speak, you affect both
others and yourself. The end goal of
words is to edify both. Yelling *crap*
when your frustrated is little different than yelling the s-word if 1) your
mental state is the same and 2) the effect it has on other people is the same,
as per the apostle Paul when he says do not make your brother stumble. With regards to 1), we must have OWNERSHIP of
ourselves, self-control in all things, especially in what we say. If swearing
means victory of the flesh over the spirit, the prevailing of bodily impulses
over your conscious, then it’s wrong. There is no action that doesn’t affect one’s
character – not one – because even the most trivial thing you do is either an
exercise in self-control or indulgence.
And if character is the ability to do the right thing even when one
doesn’t feel like it, then character is made through self-control.
As for 2), there are times when using a euphemism has less
of a negative influence than spouting the real thing, particularly in front of younger, more
impressionable kids, much more so than say, if you were with the military.
So, while the overwhelming majority of cussing is an abuse
of the tongue, and is thus immoral, there are times when it produces a positive
result. For me personally, I have many
pithy motivators that I recite to myself for the purpose of spurring a specific
mindset or action. This is called auto-suggestion, and some of them contain
swear words. A particularly effective one runs in the voice of one of my
role-models:
“You got one life to live, why wait tomorrow to start it? Right the fuck now! Today begins, tomorrow continues, and it never ends, until you’ve reached your goal and crossed the finish line, with your hand held victorious.”
“You got one life to live, why wait tomorrow to start it? Right the fuck now! Today begins, tomorrow continues, and it never ends, until you’ve reached your goal and crossed the finish line, with your hand held victorious.”
Could I just say friek? Sure, but it simply wouldn’t be as
effective. It wouldn’t produce the same
sense of urgency. In this case, the
f-word doesn’t tear people down or represent a cancerous state of mind. It’s just a word. And like all words, it can
be used for good and evil, some just one way more than the other.
Swear words are extreme tools, be careful when you use
them. In most cases using them is wrong,
(not only wrong – they can make you sound like a moron, because most people who
cuss liberally are tools), though in
other cases they are appropriate, according to the need of the moment. But the problem is usually cussing too often,
not too little. Many people need to be chastened for swearing too liberally while rarely does one need to be chastened for swearing too little.
Exercise self-control in your speech, maintain a positive and
healthy mental attitude, and edify others by your words. Swearing should be used to fit in that.
There is a difference, I think, theologically from using obscene (or "dirty" or vulgar or unceremonious) speech and actually profane speech, in which actual holy things are profaned. Vain use of "God" or "Jesus Christ" or "Mother Mary" is actually condemned in the decalogue, and ought to be far more offensive than language referring (angrily or otherwise) to feces or coitus or racial groups.
ReplyDeleteI think you're spot on. Kind of chilling, then, how taking the Lord's name in vain is more socially acceptable than using harsh language.
ReplyDeleteA grouping of letters does not represent the actual thing itself.
ReplyDeleteMeaning and truth is the end-all.
How many people repeat Pavlovian words ad-nausium, only to not actually have the thing itself which the grouping of letters are ostensibly describing and supposedly representing??
Only fools do not see that "good words" are at least as dangerous as "bad words".
One might actually start to believe they have what they have not.
Great point Roy, or that there are even such things as "good" and "bad" words at all.
ReplyDeleteMorality is a test of our conformity rather than our integrity.
ReplyDeleteCursing is actually a little less clear. There’s an admonition not to curse parents in Exodus 21:7 (and repeated in Leviticus 20:9). In Matthew 15:4 Jesus quotes those verses but “curse” is translated as “speaks evil of.”
ReplyDeletecursing in any way is not moral for me.
ReplyDelete